Introduction: Penile augmentation with foreign material injection is used to increase penile length, girth, or both. Most of these individuals develop complications due to an abnormal mass formation known as penile paraffinoma. Multiple surgical techniques for restoring penile function and correcting near-normal penile shape have been developed, but prior techniques have some post-operative complications. Methods: We explained the smile incision-modified technique for penile paraffinoma reconstruction using illustrations to describe step-by-step procedures. This study aimed to describe our modified surgical technique for reconstruction to correct complications due to disastrous consequences of failed penile augmentation. Results: A total of 16 patients aged 28–66 years (mean: 44.25 ± 2.63) were operated with a smile incision-modified technique from January 2017 until December 2020 in Semarang Dr. Kariadi tertiary hospital. There were no intraoperative complications observed. We found hematoma in 3 patients in a 1-week follow-up. After 2 weeks of post-operative surgery, all patients had no skin dehiscence or necrosis. Cosmetic appearance and functional improvement after reconstruction were acceptable by all patients. Conclusion: Penile paraffinoma reconstruction using the smile incision-modified technique was a feasible and effective technique to manage penile paraffinoma patients with good esthetic results and minor complications.

1.
Downey AP, Osman NI, Mangera A, Inman RD, Reid SV, Chapple CR. Penile paraffinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):894–8.
2.
Vladislav D, Vladislav M, Pencho G. Early result of meshed split-tickness skin graft in patient with paraffinoma of penis. Urol Case Rep. 2021;34:101499.
3.
Rosecker Á, Bordás N, Pajor L, Bajory Z. Hungarian “jailhouse rock”: incidence and morbidity of vaseline self-injection of the penis. J Sex Med. 2013;10(2):509–15.
4.
Dellis AE, Arkoumanis T, Kyprianou C, Papatsoris AG. Paraffinoma, siliconoma and Co: disastrous consequences of failed penile augmentation – a single-centre successful surgical management of a challenging entity. Andrologia. 2018;50(10):e13109.
5.
Soebhali B, Felicio J, Oliveira P, Martins FE. Sclerosing lipogranuloma of the penis: a narrative review of complications and treatment. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(6):2705–14.
6.
Boucher F, Bayoux R, Allepot K, Braye F, Mojallal A, Morel-Journel N, et al. The bilateral scrotal flap: anatomical study and it’s use for the management of inflammatory granulomas following custom-made injections. 6 ed. Elsevier. p. 459–65.
7.
Chon W, Koo JY, Park MJ, Choi KU, Park HJ, Park NC. Paraffin granuloma associated with buried glans penis-induced sexual and voiding dysfunction. World J Mens Health. 2017;35(2):129–32.
8.
Kim SW, Yoon BI, Ha US, Kim SW, Cho YH, Sohn DW. Treatment of paraffin-induced lipogranuloma of the penis by bipedicled scrotal flap with YV incision. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(6):692–5.
9.
Symeonidis A, Symeonidis EN, Toutziaris C, Dimitriadis G. Obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as the initial presentation of penile paraffinoma: a case report and literature review. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:265.
10.
Svensøy JN, Travers V, Osther PJS. Complications of penile self-injections: investigation of 680 patients with complications following penile self-injections with mineral oil. World J Urol. 2018;36(1):135–43.
11.
Pehlivanov G, Kavaklieva S, Kazandjieva J, Kapnilov D, Tsankov N. Foreign-body granuloma of the penis in sexually active individuals (penile paraffinoma). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(7):845–51.
12.
Dellis AE, Nastos K, Mastorakos D, Dellaportas D, Papatsoris A, Arkoumanis PT. Minimal surgical management of penile paraffinoma after subcutaneous penile paraffin injection. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(4):387–90.
13.
Kim JS, Shin YS, Park JK. Penile skin preservation technique for reconstruction surgery of penile paraffinoma. Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60(2):133–7.
14.
Adamyan RT, Kamalov AA, Ehoyan MM, Starceva OI, Urshevich EN, Sinelnikov MY. Scrotal tissues: the perfect material for urogenital reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jul;8(7):e2948.
15.
Shin YS, Zhao C, Park JK. New reconstructive surgery for penile paraffinoma to prevent necrosis of ventral penile skin. Urology. 2013;81(2):437–41.
16.
Murányi M, Varga D, Kiss Z, Flaskó T. A new modified bipedicle scrotal skin flap technique for the reconstruction of penile skin in patients with paraffin-induced sclerosing lipogranuloma of the penis. J Urol. 2022;208(1):171–8.
17.
Soebhali B. Sclerosing lipogranuloma of the penis: a review of management and classification. Bali Med J. 2020;9(1):55–61.
18.
Ismy J, Amirsyah M, Palgunadi IN, Firdaus GI, Fakhrulrizal F, Khalilullah SA. One-stage reconstruction of penile paraffinoma using spiral stitches FTSG and evaluation of sexual function. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(1):e4048.
19.
Bryk DJ, Yamaguchi Y, Zhao LC. Tissue transfer techniques in reconstructive urology. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(7):478–86.
20.
Fakin R, Zimmermann S, Jindarak S, Lindenblatt N, Giovanoli P, Suwajo P. Reconstruction of penile shaft defects following silicone injection by bipedicled anterior scrotal flap. J Urol. 2017;197(4):1166–70.
You do not currently have access to this content.